Skip to content
Magazine
Wednesday, July 2, 2025
SUBSCRIBE
  • About Us
  • Belgium News
    • Belgium Police News
    • Brussels News
  • EU Institutions News
    • European Commission News
    • European Parliament News
    • European Council News
  • Europe News
  • World News
  • Belgium Business News
  • Culture and Society News
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
  • About Us
  • Belgium News
    • Belgium Police News
    • Brussels News
  • EU Institutions News
    • European Commission News
    • European Parliament News
    • European Council News
  • Europe News
  • World News
  • Belgium Business News
  • Culture and Society News
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
SUBSCRIBE

Unraveling the Paradox: Biden’s LNG Policy and its Impact on Global Climate and Geopolitics

Charlie Weimers MEP by Charlie Weimers MEP
11 May 2024
in Opinion

Belgium (Brussels Morning Newspaper), President Joe Biden’s decision to stop approving permits for new liquified natural gas (LNG) facilities in the United States has been the subject of widespread criticism across Europe. American LNG imports are of critical importance to Europe’s energy mix: European imports are up over 140% since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the U.S. has directed two-thirds of its LNG exports to the European market.

The criticism of President Biden’s decision in recent weeks has focused mostly on geopolitics – stopping LNG threatens Europe’s energy security: it could force some countries back towards Russian energy sources and it restricts supply, making future price shocks more likely.

However, less discussed is that this decision, ironically, undermines global environmental efforts. This matters, because the entire justification for the U.S. ‘pause’ in granting permits was that the climate impacts need to be prioritized, even ahead of important considerations such as global security and job creation. The problem is that the Administration’s environmental case does not stand up to basic scrutiny.

That coal is substantially worse for the environment than LNG is not in doubt. A detailed Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) from the U.S.’ own National Energy Technology Lab in 2019 showed that U.S. LNG exports for European and Asian markets would significantly reduce life cycle greenhouse gas emissions when compared to coal use. The LCA also modeled the emissions of Russian natural gas. Again, U.S. LNG exports were significantly cleaner.

This makes the American decision all the more surprising, and confounding even, as the precise medium-term impact of the U.S. decision will be that coal production increases and Russian natural gas exports to Europe increase. The U.S. will either expand or restart domestic coal production to meet the demand gap caused by the halt to LNG expansion. This decision will not be the gift of the Administration: the market will demand it, and local and state officials will make the rational decision to pursue it.

Similarly, the Asian markets to whom the U.S. currently supplies LNG are not replete with options for filling the unmet additional demand in the future. Those options that do exist are not climate-friendly: domestic coal production remains high across south and southeast Asia and could easily be ramped up. China is also a significant exporter of coal and would no doubt jump at the opportunity to take some of America’s market share.

And what of Europe? The Green Deal, for all its promises, is yet to deliver an arcadia powered by sun, wind, and waves. It will not have done so by the time the effects of the LNG pause kick in – comfortably within the term of the next EU Commission and Parliament.

Where will we turn? Some, probably, to coal – Poland and Germany, for example, to Germany’s coal. Others may look east again, despite all the dangers (including higher GHG emissions). Although Qatari gas could potentially expand supply, it is hardly a more appealing supplier compared to Russia, given its financial support of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. Furthermore, the risks and costs associated with shipments through the Red Sea are unlikely to ease in the coming years.

Consider these scenarios: rising emissions as old, dirty fuels are re-animated combined with Allies newly reliant on coal from China, or gas from Russia.  The climate case for LNG and the geopolitical case are intertwined.

Some policy decisions – many, in fact – are essentially judgments about competing outcomes. One course of action could be environmentally beneficial, but potentially lower economic growth; another could be important for national security but risks raising emissions.

President Biden’s decision to block future LNG permits does not fall into this category. It is bad economics, bad for security, and will raise global emissions. There is no beneficial trade-off to compensate for the negative effects that will fall on America and her allies in Europe and Asia.

Europe, must not be gulled by the U.S. insistence that this is a climate-friendly measure. The science, combined with the market reality, simply does not support that claim. When a policy increases emissions, undermines alliances, and harms energy security, opposing it is the only sensible option.


Dear reader,

Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. As always, we remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.Sincerely, The Brussels Morning Team

Related News:

  • Joe Biden’s Foreign Policy Paradox
  • Climate change: a global challenge in search of a global policy
  • The Norwegian energy transition paradox
  • Xi Jinping’s European Odyssey: Unraveling China’s Strategic Maneuvering
Tags: NewsOpinion section
Next Post
EU Commission Approves French Funding for Biomass and Renewable Hydrogen Development

EU Commission Approves French Funding for Biomass and Renewable Hydrogen Development

Latest post

EU-elections-UK

EU elections: UK looks on from the “outside”

1 year ago
Galeries-Royales-Saint-Hubert

What Makes Galeries Royales Saint-Hubert an “Institution”?

1 year ago

Most Read

    Follow Brussels Morning
    Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin

    Browse Important News

    Belgium News
    Brussels News
    Culture and Society News
    Economy News
    EU Institutions News
    European Commission News
    European Council News
    European Parliament News
    Europe News
    Health And Fitness News
    Southeast Europe News
    Sustainable Perspective
    World News
    Diplomacy News
    US Elections News

    About Us

    Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

    More Info

    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies Policy

    Join Our Newsletter

    Brussels Morning Newspaper – All Rights Reserved © 2024

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Belgium News
      • Belgium Police News
      • Brussels News
    • Brussels Bubble
      • European Parliament News
      • European Commission News
      • European Council News
    • Wider Europe
      • Member States
    • World News
    • Business & Society
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Culture & Society
    • Policy Talks
      • Place de la Bourse
      • The Macro-Economist
      • Sustainable Perspective
      • Ambassador’s Corner
      • The American Angle
      • Southeast Europe
    • Print Magazine

    Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT