Skip to content
Magazine
Saturday, August 2, 2025
SUBSCRIBE
  • About Us
  • Belgium News
    • Belgium Police News
    • Brussels News
  • EU Institutions News
    • European Commission News
    • European Parliament News
    • European Council News
  • Europe News
  • World News
  • Belgium Business News
  • Culture and Society News
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
  • About Us
  • Belgium News
    • Belgium Police News
    • Brussels News
  • EU Institutions News
    • European Commission News
    • European Parliament News
    • European Council News
  • Europe News
  • World News
  • Belgium Business News
  • Culture and Society News
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
SUBSCRIBE

Should the EU get involved in diabetes?

Pernille Weiss MEP by Pernille Weiss MEP
21 November 2022
in Opinion
Doctor,Taking,Sample,Of,Diabetic,Patient's,Blood,Using,Lancet,Pen,

Doctor taking sample of diabetic patient's blood using lancet pen, closeup

Belgium, (Brussels Morning Newspaper) This week, the European Parliament will adopt a resolution focusing on diabetes, and I am one of the negotiators of the text. The occasion is the recent UN Diabetes Day. Ten years have passed since the EU’s elected representatives have explicitly dealt with diabetes. A lot has happened in those ten years.

The number of diabetics has risen sharply, and there is a prospect of even more. Right now, 33 million EU citizens have diabetes, and in 2030 the number is expected to rise to 38 million. Not because the population will increase in the EU – quite the opposite. But what we are witnessing is that a larger proportion of EU citizens get diabetes. The estimate is that half of the diagnosed have such unstable blood sugar that it leads to further complications. Suppose the EU and all member states had given treatment, guidance, research, and innovation in diabetes a higher priority. In that case, they could have avoided this unfortunate development.

Health is, and must remain, a national responsibility. However, most research resources are placed in the EU. Therefore, it only makes sense that the EU utilizes the collective framework to share and develop knowledge. Especially when health among the population – or rather the lack of it – ultimately harms our economic muscle, productivity, and ability to withstand external health crises such as a pandemic. After all, Covid-19 showed that people with diabetes were among the most vulnerable. Both during the corona outbreak, but also especially during the rehabilitation after having the viral infection.

The socioeconomic challenge of diabetes is that it takes up, on average, as much as 10% of the countries’ healthcare costs, and 75 % of them is spent solely on handling the complications. Diabetes is the fourth most frequent cause of death in the EU. Both things are worth including when you want to understand, why the EU should take a more active approach than before. In fact – and here I am repeating myself on purpose – better prevention, guidance, and more precise treatment of citizens with the disease could have prevented many EU citizens from being diagnosed. 

It is simply too foolish a way to spend taxpayers’ money on the health sector. Changing this is a task for the EU because no EU country is big enough to do it by itself. The fact is that diabetes affects all social groups, and well-treated diabetes requires a plan targeted individually.

Therefore, we must research, develop, and inspire each other much more to reverse the regretful development. We must reduce the number of people, who get diabetes and ensure people with diabetes have a much better quality of life. We must reduce late complications, which unfortunately cause people with diabetes to leave the labor market prematurely and ease the financial burden on our healthcare systems. If successful, it could free up resources to benefit other patient groups or other public responsibilities.   

So, what can the EU do to address diabetes more effectively in the future? There may be a better solution to the challenge than sending more money. Imagining that all EU citizens can and must be treated equally for their diabetes is a naive quick-fix mirage. Us Europeans live so differently in terms of lifestyle that it won’t make sense. However, give us better labeling of the food and make it cheaper to choose the healthiest food, among many other things.

We also need to do more research and collect better data to take more targeted and effective action. It requires a common data collection tool and a common language to improve the exchange of knowledge and experience with each other across countries and regions. It is easy to say, but it isn’t. That is why it is also good that the EU has begun to develop a common health database. Not an easy task because we must avoid such a database becoming a bureaucratic monster that takes the air out of the desire for research and development between public and private companies. In Denmark – unlike Europe in general – we are very good at precisely this fruitful collaboration between public and private actors when it comes to research and development, and this has a highly positive knock-on effect in the life-science area. Something the other EU countries could learn from.

Another important thing – which I think is the most important – is recognizing the very cause of most diabetes diagnoses. It is severe corpulence. Obesity, which almost 60% of all adult EU citizens either have or are in the early stages of, for many, is a chronic disease. In other words, not something about the individual’s lifestyle choices, which means they can neither exercise nor diet their way out. Therefore, it is crazy that severe obesity, when a chronic disorder, can activate 200 other diseases, then diabetes. Which we also pour money into solving – without doing it particularly effectively – is not recognized and appropriately addressed with national and EU action plans as a separate issue.

The resolution needs to emphasize that point more clearly, and at the time of writing, I am working on getting it into the text.

Related News:

  • US to extend sanctions on companies involved in Nord Stream 2
Tags: Brussels DirectMEPNewsOpinion section
Next Post
EP-051364A_Tajani_Brexit

European Parliament look ahead — World Cup, rule of law, essential infrastructure, EU budget 2023

Latest post

EU-elections-UK

EU elections: UK looks on from the “outside”

1 year ago
Galeries-Royales-Saint-Hubert

What Makes Galeries Royales Saint-Hubert an “Institution”?

1 year ago

Most Read

    Follow Brussels Morning
    Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin

    Browse Important News

    Belgium News
    Brussels News
    Culture and Society News
    Economy News
    EU Institutions News
    European Commission News
    European Council News
    European Parliament News
    Europe News
    Health And Fitness News
    Southeast Europe News
    Sustainable Perspective
    World News
    Diplomacy News
    US Elections News

    About Us

    Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

    More Info

    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies Policy

    Join Our Newsletter

    Brussels Morning Newspaper – All Rights Reserved © 2024

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Belgium News
      • Belgium Police News
      • Brussels News
    • Brussels Bubble
      • European Parliament News
      • European Commission News
      • European Council News
    • Wider Europe
      • Member States
    • World News
    • Business & Society
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Culture & Society
    • Policy Talks
      • Place de la Bourse
      • The Macro-Economist
      • Sustainable Perspective
      • Ambassador’s Corner
      • The American Angle
      • Southeast Europe
    • Print Magazine

    Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT