Skip to content
Magazine
Saturday, August 2, 2025
SUBSCRIBE
  • About Us
  • Belgium News
    • Belgium Police News
    • Brussels News
  • EU Institutions News
    • European Commission News
    • European Parliament News
    • European Council News
  • Europe News
  • World News
  • Belgium Business News
  • Culture and Society News
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
  • About Us
  • Belgium News
    • Belgium Police News
    • Brussels News
  • EU Institutions News
    • European Commission News
    • European Parliament News
    • European Council News
  • Europe News
  • World News
  • Belgium Business News
  • Culture and Society News
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
SUBSCRIBE

Bilateral partners no longer view the US as an indispensable nation

Lincoln Mitchell by Lincoln Mitchell
2 April 2021
in The American Angle
American flag in front of a wall and flags of other countries

American flag in front of a wall and flags of other countries

How the US image overseas has changed, according to Lincoln Mitchell.

New York (Brussels Morning) During the height of America’s post-Cold War ascendancy, Madeleine Albright, US Secretary of State at the time, referred to the US as the “indispensable nation”, and in the next sentence added, “We stand tall and we see further than other countries into the future”. 

Those comments were made during an interview on the Today Show in 1998 and reflected a consensus among the American foreign policy leadership at the time that the US was the most powerful — which was true — important —which was clearly not true — and moral — which was absurd — country in the world. The choice of words by the Secretary of State was unfortunate as they implied that, at that time, 5.7 billion people who were not Americans were somehow, along with their countries, dispensable. 

Albright’s words quickly became almost a point of pride for American foreign policy. In the decade and a half after that it was not unusual to hear that phrase quoted by American diplomats and others at conferences, academic settings and in the media. It was generally understood that what Albright meant was that the US must play a major role in solving global problems, but the literal meaning of the words, and the American embrace of that idea, could not be unheard and revealed an important truth about America’s view of itself.

Frayed picture

Today the idea of America as the indispensable, or more charitably, essential, nation is badly frayed. In some respects, the last four years gave the rest of the world, whether friend or foe of the US, a glimpse of what a world without American leadership might look like. No country paid closer attention to that than China, because it is clear by now that if American leadership continues to wane, China is the country that will fill that void.

In the first decades of this century, US foreign policy has been dominated by the Global War on Terror which led to the endless wars for endless peace in Iraq and Afghanistan, conflicts with Russia over issues as disparate as Crimea and American elections, trying to contain Iran’s nuclear program, instability in Mexico and South of America and similar problems. Through all of that China’s slow rise was consistent, hard to miss and inevitable, but rarely a sufficient focus of attention at the highest levels of American statecraft. 

Now when the world has learned that America is more or less as indispensable, or dispensable, as any other country, it is no longer possible for the US to minimise the importance of the relationship with China. The US-China is the single most bilateral relationship in the world and, to borrow a phrase from the great recession, is too big to fail. That bilateral relationship is more challenging for the Biden administration because of typically Trumpian combination of bluster and capitulation that characterised the previous administration’s relationship to China.

China relationship

Trump’s China policy mixed strength and weakness in precisely the wrong way. By talking tough at home while letting China get its way on more or less everything, Trump increased the domestic appetite for conflict with China, while doing nothing to challenge China in a meaningful way. Some of Trump’s confrontational language, most notably his insistence on describing the Coronavirus in racist anti-Chinese language, had very real effects and contributed to the substantial rise in violence against Asian Americans during 2020.

As with so many issues, President Biden must more or less flip Trump’s China approach on its head. There is nothing to gain from verbal sabre rattling, particularly to domestic audiences. Anything that unnecessarily increases tensions between China and the US is bad for both countries. However, this does not mean that the US should not take a tougher approach on a handful of major policy differences with China. Human rights, including but not limited to the crimes against humanity that are being committed against the Uighurs, trade policy, China’s relationships with various American allies in the region and the need to cooperate on global problems such as pandemics and climate changes are all difficult substantive challenges facing the US-China relationship. None of these are easy and all are made more difficult by ratcheting up anger and tension between the two countries.

Joe Biden will have to meet this dilemma in a new context, one where the US has had its flaws once again revealed to the rest of the world, but this time in an environment when American hegemony is increasingly something from another era. While this may weaken the US position relative to China, it also forces the US to approach this relationship with a stronger understanding of China’s interests and no longer being informed by dangerous platitudes about who is or is not dispensable. If done right, this can lead to a stronger foundation for this difficult bilateral relationship. 

Related News:

  • Nation to Nation — Can Scotland carve out its own foreign policy?
  • Why wage policies are indispensable
  • VPAs, the EU’s crown jewel, are indispensable for fighting global deforestation
  • Social partners not against shorter summer holidays in education, ‘but not yet’
Tags: News
Next Post
Greece and Republic of Turkey are the two neighboring countries flags

Greece and Turkey discuss border demarcation dispute

Latest post

EU-elections-UK

EU elections: UK looks on from the “outside”

1 year ago
Galeries-Royales-Saint-Hubert

What Makes Galeries Royales Saint-Hubert an “Institution”?

1 year ago

Most Read

    Follow Brussels Morning
    Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin

    Browse Important News

    Belgium News
    Brussels News
    Culture and Society News
    Economy News
    EU Institutions News
    European Commission News
    European Council News
    European Parliament News
    Europe News
    Health And Fitness News
    Southeast Europe News
    Sustainable Perspective
    World News
    Diplomacy News
    US Elections News

    About Us

    Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

    More Info

    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies Policy

    Join Our Newsletter

    Brussels Morning Newspaper – All Rights Reserved © 2024

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Belgium News
      • Belgium Police News
      • Brussels News
    • Brussels Bubble
      • European Parliament News
      • European Commission News
      • European Council News
    • Wider Europe
      • Member States
    • World News
    • Business & Society
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Culture & Society
    • Policy Talks
      • Place de la Bourse
      • The Macro-Economist
      • Sustainable Perspective
      • Ambassador’s Corner
      • The American Angle
      • Southeast Europe
    • Print Magazine

    Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT