Skip to content
Magazine
Saturday, August 2, 2025
SUBSCRIBE
  • About Us
  • Belgium News
    • Belgium Police News
    • Brussels News
  • EU Institutions News
    • European Commission News
    • European Parliament News
    • European Council News
  • Europe News
  • World News
  • Belgium Business News
  • Culture and Society News
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
  • About Us
  • Belgium News
    • Belgium Police News
    • Brussels News
  • EU Institutions News
    • European Commission News
    • European Parliament News
    • European Council News
  • Europe News
  • World News
  • Belgium Business News
  • Culture and Society News
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
SUBSCRIBE

Europe Must Cap Executive Pay or Face Labor Unrest

Sam Vaknin by Sam Vaknin
1 January 2024
in Opinion
Depositor,Withdraws,Euro,From,Atm,Cash,Money,Machine.,Man,Hand

Depositor withdraws EURO from ATM cash money machine. Man hand holding EURO banknotes at the ATM machine

Belgium (Brussels Morning newspaper) Before it is too late, Europe should reign in executive pay and cap it. Otherwise, it is headed towards a period of massive strikes and a decline in the profitability of its industries. 

In terms of Purchasing Power Standards (PPS), Europe is still way more equitable than the USA, for instance. Copious social transfers redistribute resources from the rich to the poor, thus dramatically reducing the dreaded Gini coefficient all over the European Union. 

But across the continent, income inequality has been on the rise as has inflation, a regressive tax on the poor. 

Such convergent adverse conditions always lead to increased labor unionization, labor unrest, and a realignment of the interests of stakeholders in private business: shareholders (capital), labor, and management. 

Recently, the United Auto Workers (UAW) won their battle against Detroit’s Big Three auto manufacturers which also own European production assets and automotive brands. 

Wage negotiations are an intricate dance. As the economist Richard Lester observed, they do not reflect only hard, cold data such as productivity figures or profits. There is a “range of indeterminacy” within which wages fall.

The reason for this uncertainty is an information asymmetry. Workers don’t have access to the big picture or even to other workers’s output and income info. 

Workers are also often interchangeable and dispensable. Many of them do not have the financial cushion to survive a strike or litigation against the workplace. 

Only when employees band together – unionize – does their aggregate power right the scales, to some extent. A Gallup survey of millions of workers in multiple industries over several decades found that unionized workers earn 10-20% more than their brethren who are not members of a labor union.

Moreover: the extra pay does not affect economic growth, only bloated executive pay and bottom-line profitability. But even so, wages make a mere 5-15% of the cost of any given product.

Wages are one example of the conflict between rapacious executives and all other business stakeholders.

Managers are supposed to generate higher returns to shareholders by increasing the value of the firm’s assets and, therefore, of the firm. If they fail to do so, goes the moral tale, they are booted out mercilessly.

This is one manifestation of the “Principal-Agent Problem”. It is defined thus by the Oxford Dictionary of Economics:

“The problem of how a person A can motivate person B to act for A’s benefit rather than following (his) self-interest.”

The obvious answer is that A can never motivate B not to follow B’s self-interest – never mind what the incentives are. That economists pretend otherwise – in “optimal contracting theory” – just serves to demonstrate how divorced economics is from human psychology and, thus, from reality.

Managers will always rob blind the companies they run. They will always manipulate boards to collude in their shenanigans. They will always bribe auditors to bend the rules. They will always deny workers just wages. In other words, they will always act in their self-interest. 

In their defense, they can say that the damage from such actions to each shareholder is minuscule while the benefits to the manager are enormous. In other words, this is the rational, self-interested, thing to do.

But why do shareholders cooperate with such corporate brigandage? In an important Chicago Law Review article titled “Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation”, the authors demonstrate how the typical stock option granted to managers as part of their remuneration rewards mediocrity rather than encourages excellence.

But everything falls into place if we realize that shareholders and managers are allied against the firm – not pitted against each other. 

The paramount interest of both shareholders and managers is to increase the value of the stock – regardless of the true value of the firm. Both are concerned with the performance of the share – rather than the performance of the firm. Both are preoccupied with boosting the share’s price – rather than the company’s business.

Hence the inflationary executive pay packets. Shareholders hire stock manipulators – euphemistically known as “managers” – to generate expectations regarding the future prices of their shares. 

These snake oil salesmen and snake charmers – corporate executives – are allowed by shareholders to loot the company providing that they generate consistent capital gains to their masters by provoking persistent interest and excitement around the business. Shareholders, in other words, do not behave as owners of the firm – they behave as free-riders.

The Principal-Agent Problem arises in other social interactions and is equally misunderstood there. 

Employers and employees, producers and consumers all reify the Principal-Agent Problem. Economists would do well to discard their models and go back to basics. They could start by asking:

Why do shareholders acquiesce to executive malfeasance as long as share prices are rising?

Could it mean that the interests of shareholders and managers are identical? 

Nothing happens by accident or by coercion. Shareholders aided and abetted the current crop of corporate executives enthusiastically. They knew well what was happening. They may not have been aware of the exact nature and extent of the rot, but they witnessed approvingly the public relations antics, insider trading, stock option resetting, unwinding, and unloading, share price manipulation, opaque transactions, and outlandish pay packages. Investors remained mum through the corruption of the globalized corporate universe. It is time for the hangover.

The Good Enough Firm

Conventional economics is based on wildly unrealistic assumptions regarding human nature and, by extension, the conduct of human institutions. One of them is that firms – led by agents and egged on by principals – seek to maximize both profits and productivity. 

This is nonsense. Firms seek to optimize – not maximize – profits by choosing the path of least resistance. As far as productivity: it depends on how fierce the competition is. Absent competition, there is no incentive to increase it. Firms invariably settle on being good enough, until they are rattled by an external shock.

One way to remedy all these pathologies is, therefore, to introduce competition, both from within the European Union and from without. Perhaps 18-century economists were not so wrong after all.

Dear reader,

Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. As always, we remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.Sincerely, The Brussels Morning Team

Related News:

  • Gender pay gap: Parliament backs binding pay-transparency measures
  • Risk consultancy warns about possible civil unrest
  • Social unrest VRT: fewer naked layoffs, strike at ‘Thuis’
  • Unrest in Congo: Post-Election Turmoil Raises Concerns of Coup
Tags: NewsOpinion section
Next Post
Do Eagles Have Teeth

Do Eagles Have Teeth? Facts About It

Latest post

EU-elections-UK

EU elections: UK looks on from the “outside”

1 year ago
Galeries-Royales-Saint-Hubert

What Makes Galeries Royales Saint-Hubert an “Institution”?

1 year ago

Most Read

    Follow Brussels Morning
    Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin

    Browse Important News

    Belgium News
    Brussels News
    Culture and Society News
    Economy News
    EU Institutions News
    European Commission News
    European Council News
    European Parliament News
    Europe News
    Health And Fitness News
    Southeast Europe News
    Sustainable Perspective
    World News
    Diplomacy News
    US Elections News

    About Us

    Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

    More Info

    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookies Policy

    Join Our Newsletter

    Brussels Morning Newspaper – All Rights Reserved © 2024

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Belgium News
      • Belgium Police News
      • Brussels News
    • Brussels Bubble
      • European Parliament News
      • European Commission News
      • European Council News
    • Wider Europe
      • Member States
    • World News
    • Business & Society
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Culture & Society
    • Policy Talks
      • Place de la Bourse
      • The Macro-Economist
      • Sustainable Perspective
      • Ambassador’s Corner
      • The American Angle
      • Southeast Europe
    • Print Magazine

    Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT